Monday, February 28, 2011

So You Think You Can Write Poetry: Noetry and Constructive Criticism

So you want to be a poet. When you desperately want something, it’s difficult to get past the wanting, and look into the mechanics of achieving that thing. It’s not enough to want to be a poet, just like it’s not enough to want to be a dancer. Dancing requires grace, agility, athleticism, rhythm and unwavering dedication. The tall, gawky kid with two left feet hiding out at the back of gym class might have early fantasies of being discovered on So You Think You Can Dance, but those fantasies probably disappear in their late teens when reality kicks in.

Unfortunately, in the case of poetry, the requisite talents are not so clear-cut. If only there were an equivalent So You Think You Can Write , we could all just turn up at the cattle call audition and have our hopeful hearts broken by a Simon-Cowell-esque judge wielding a quill and a dictionary. Even then though, there’d be those few tragics left staring forlornly but defiantly into the camera whining What would he know? He wouldn’t know a decent poet if they smacked him in the face with their next manuscript. My MUM and all my mates LOVE my writing, and they should know, they’ve read it ALL.

Noetry is one of my pet hates. I write noetry a lot. Probably sixty percent of what I write, I’d consider to be noetry. I don’t mean poetry that people don’t like. I mean bad poetry. I mean Oh-no!-poetry.

I don’t particularly like Sylvia Plath’s poetry: I think most of it is angst-ridden self-indulgence. But it’s not really bad poetry. I mean, it has literary merit and I can see why other people might like it.

But what if you’d like to be a professional poet and you’re just not up to it? What if all you write is noetry, and you desperately want to be a published poet?

Do you have critics brave enough to tell you your writing sucks, and are you ready to hear it?

Are you going to insist your poetry is misunderstood genius, self-publish your work and force your (secretly bewildered) family and friends to buy all fifty copies?

With time, and workshopping, and honest writer-friends and editors, I’ve become more able to recognise my noetry. I shelve it, trash it, burn it and delete it. I cross out line after line, cringe at keyboard after keyboard and curse a lot. And I’m starting to write noetry less and less. (Uhhhh...I think).

But sometimes people ask me to read their poetry and tell them what I think. And sometimes.... I lie. I know, I know. I shouldn’t. I’m not doing them any favours.

But what if someone you know quite well presents you triumphantly with a notebook full of poetry that they’re convinced is sheer genius, and looks at you with hopeful, expectant eyes waiting for you to confirm they’re the next best thing since Shakespeare? Can you take the 'well... it’s a matter of opinion...' route and weasel out, or are you going to break their heart?

When I was studying poetry at university I had the pleasure of being taught by Alan Wearne, poet and verse novelist extraordinaire and one of Australia’s all-time poetry greats. During my time as his student, I workshopped a poem called Slogan on the Moon. It was probably the first political poem I ever wrote. It was about something I read in the newspaper about Pizza Hut wanting to laser beam their logo onto the moon as a marketing stunt.

When it came time to talk about that particular poem, Wearne grabbed at his head, clearly in pain, and told me (in front of the class) it was “Just awful...it’s hard to believe the person who wrote those other poems wrote this I mean it’s just SO bad.”

I wasn’t devastated, but furious. He obviously just didn’t get it. It was one of the most insightful poems I’d ever written. Just because he didn’t like it, didn’t mean it wasn't a brilliant poem. After all, that was just his opinion.

I found Slogan on the Moon recently in an old writing portfolio.

I wanted to shrivel up and die.

It is, quite possibly, the worst poem in the history of mankind.

When the voice of noetry reason comes to visit you, will you tear out its vocal chords, or swallow your pride and listen?

15 comments:

  1. Excellent post Maxine - poetry can be seen as a craft (as well as an aethete and sometimes inspiration) that literally takes years and years to develop and the earlier stuff is always going to look a bit crap when you look back (mine certainly does - haha) but it is all part of the process (the apprentice years). I also thing poets need to read a hell of a lot of poetry and understand what has come before (the history of the stuff) otherwise they are just plopping words on a page and calling it poetry (and that is fine if you are writing it just for yourself (and for cathartic or therapy reasons) and to communicate to family and friends). The problem is 'poets' are sensitive people by nature and easily depressed by perceived criticisms - developing a thick skin is easier said than done - particularly when the content of the poem means a lot to them (but just because it means a lot to the writer doesn't mean it is any good - poems are better if they address broader themes or issues I think. I better finish now - haha ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. i will listen Maxine, i promise! very little of my "early work" will be making an appearance in print, that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent Maxine and oh so true. Even us non-poet writers write noetry.

    I've been writing a column on writing for our national newspaper for a few months and because of it people feel they can send me their writing and ask me to make comments on it. The way I feel is this- if it is crap and I say it is, they don't believe me and I look like a schmuck. If it is crap and I say it's good I feel like I'm trying to keep that person in a place where they will not compete with me (we have a small writing community) a place where they will write badly forever. And that makes me feel bad about me.

    So I'm lost for what to do. Mostly I just want them to stop asking me. What do I know anyway??

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the idea of The Poetry Apprentice, Gabrielle! And you're right: it's usually 'poets' who don't read 'poetry' who mostly write noetry :)

    Noah: the fact that you show an awareness of your potential noetry probably means you don't write much of it anymore, I reckon.

    Lauri - It's a hard one. I know what you mean. It seems like you're damned if you do and if you don't. I reckon be honest when you feel you can but then I'm mindful that sometimes that's so hard to do...and yes, that many would-be writers (like I did with 'Slogan on the Moon') simply choose not to believe their writing is, well, quite frankly, embarrassingly bad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I fear I am a noet, Maxine. Have you been honest with me?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't know Cat - reveal yourself and I promise I'll be honest.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really enjoyed this post, Maxine. I never really think of my poems as finished...so when I pull up old ones (99 percent cringe-worthy) I always end up toying with them again before realizing that they were dead on delivery and that no amount of tweaking is gonna save them. But sometimes you find a little gem - maybe one phrase or a line that just makes you smile - and realize it's not 100 percent dreck (only 99%) and that one phrase or line is what makes you pick up your pen again...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting post.

    Hey, that didn't rhyme!

    I'm a noet and I didn't.. know it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Tim - long time, no slam. Are you tracking me? I was over at willtypeforfood this morning.

    You're so right, Talon. It's that small margin of 'perfect' we live...or at least write...for.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've got a site tracker but no, I popped over here earlier from Ben's site. (I don't pay attention to my tracker's stats much anyway, it's just handy to see if people link to me).

    When I saw the term 'noetry' my punning mind went into action...

    ReplyDelete
  11. That's funny cause that's why I want over to willtype - the word 'noetry' somehow made me think of your oongoly doongoly type stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  12. “Noetry” is not the best way to conceptualise so-called “bad poetry.” I believe Maxine Clarke is aware of this particularly when she writes that “[p]robably sixty percent of what I write, I’d consider to be noetry.” If we consider what this statement surely means we find that there is an intimate connection between what Clarke calls “noetry” and “poetry”; that is, the writing of “noetry” appears to be necessarily a part of the writing of poetry.

    I would suggest that we avoid substituting “noetry” for “bad poetry,” for after all even bad poetry is poetry. “Noetry”—at best a joke at worst a horrible neologism—appears to suggest that it is not poetry, or even worse the very opposite of poetry.

    I believe that “bad poetry” is mostly the result of lack of experience, both in writing and reading poetry. Having said that I agree with Clarke that there is a fuzzy terminator between bad and good poetry, and even that we can distinguish good poetry amongst poetry we don’t like. Nonetheless bad poetry has its role to play in poetry, for even the best poet is often bad—at least sixty percent of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Anthony. Sorry for the very late reply. I don't substitute noetry for 'just' bad poetry. I substitute it for a specific section of bad poetry - appalling poetry - cringeworthy poetry - 'oh no' poety. In any case, this was obviously a light-hearted post (which most took it for). Most poets (including myself at times) take themselves and their work way too seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wonderful post Maxine.
    I always find it hard to say the truth, or at the least the truth of what I think; you can (almost) always find a diamond in a mountain of rubbish.
    On the other hand, since I don't get enough of the "that's sucks" response to my writing I cannot really believe anything else someone's saying.mmm... what to do here?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi Maxine,
    I think I am the poster boy/spokesman for noetry as defined. I look at stuff I post and cringe all the time. But I realize and accept the process and even though I am sensitive about my ish, I know how to laugh at myself.
    Loving the process... keep talk tuh mi, mi teacher...

    ReplyDelete